We had 17 people respond to this set of questions. We would like to bump up those numbers. If you or others want to get automatically notified of new questions and answers, subscribe at the bottom of any page.
Our respondents were all from Illinois and generally pretty experienced. You can see some graphs below.
For those wishing to go back and look at previous questions and answers, you can click on “Q&A” at the top right of the page.
There was a concern that the videos were too small. There is an easy way to see the videos in a larger window. You can click on the video, then click on the YouTube link, which opens another tab. You can then resize things even bigger if desired.
For those who are involved with organizations, if we get a handful or more responses for your organization and you let us know, we can send you your organization’s specific results.
Questions and Answers
Correct Answer: Correct
It is good to see that this was just about unanimously answered correctly. That means that we have moved past the old “solid color” rule and are correctly using the “predominant color” rule. Per Rule 4-2-2:
In this case, the four-inch side panel on the team jersey is not large enough to be considered a predominant color. That means that white is the only predominant color. Thus, the libero jersey can be all red and comply with the rule.
Correct Answer: Incorrect
There was a change made several years ago to standardize the way that lineups are submitted. This was mainly done to assist scorers to make it easier for them to record the lineups. The piece of the rule that is pertinent here is 7-1-2a:
While it isn’t 100% clear from reading this, the intent of “listing… players in the proper serving order” is a sequential list of servers (first through sixth), not a pictorial representation of where they are positioned on the court at the start of the set. An example is in the Case Book p. 68 Diagram 1, which shows the desired format for submitting the lineup on top and the court position on the bottom.
Correct Answer: (D) Remove the two points and award a loss of rally/point to Team R (who will serve next).
We did very well as a group on this one. An important point here is that even though the team figured out the problem itself and asked for the lineup check, it does not negate the fact that the wrong person served two points. Even though the serve is discussed in Rule 8, the actual penalties to apply here are listed under Rule 6-4 PENALTIES 2:
So, in this case, we remove the two points that were served and then award a loss of rally/point to the opposition. The opponents will rotate and serve next.
Correct Answer: Correct
An important concept here is that even though the setter makes a what looks like a “blocking motion,” this cannot be a block. The definition of a block (in Rule 9-5-1c) says the player “deflects the ball coming from the opponent.” Since the ball has been passed from her teammate, regardless of how the player’s action looks, it is the team’s second hit and not a block.
If we watch closely, it should be clear that the setter makes multiple contacts with the ball. Since this is the team’s second hit, multiple contacts by one player (as defined in Rule 9-4-8) are not allowed. There may be some thought towards giving some leniency and not whistling this under the “increase in continuation of play” guidelines for challenging or spectacular plays from the 2019-20 Points of Emphasis for ball handling (see 2019-20 Rule Book p. 54 and below for reference). However, it is import to realize that the additional leniency only applies to balls directed to a teammate. Thus, a double hit call here is appropriate.
Subscribe to stay informed of new questions and answers
Click at the bottom of the page